Evidencias psicométricas de la medida de causation y effectuation en emprendedores brasileños
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35622/j.rep.2026.03.001Palabras clave:
análisis factorial, emprendedores, formulación, realización, validezResumen
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo adaptar y examinar evidencias psicométricas de la Measure of Causation and Effectuation en el contexto emprendedor brasileño. Se trata de un estudio metodológico, con un enfoque predominantemente cuantitativo, desarrollado en dos etapas: adaptación cultural del instrumento mediante evaluación por expertos y análisis semántico, e investigación de sus propiedades psicométricas en una muestra de 315 emprendedores. Los análisis se realizaron con base en la Teoría Clásica de los Tests y la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem. La solución bifactorial presentó un ajuste moderado (RMSEA = 0,070; CFI = 0,903; TLI = 0,832), con una fiabilidad compuesta de 0,617 para Formulación y 0,685 para Realización e índices de replicabilidad inferiores al valor recomendado (H < 0,80). En los análisis independientes, la solución unidimensional de Formulación presentó CFI = 0,865 y TLI = 0,730, mientras que la de Realización presentó CFI = 0,948 y TLI = 0,869. Las evidencias de convergencia fueron predominantemente de baja magnitud, con correlaciones que variaron entre −0,28 y 0,43. En conjunto, los resultados evidenciaron limitaciones en la consistencia interna, la unidimensionalidad y la replicabilidad de los factores. Los hallazgos deben interpretarse como evidencias iniciales, indicando que la operacionalización actual de la medida aún presenta limitaciones para representar la complejidad de las lógicas de toma de decisiones emprendedoras y señalando la necesidad de un mayor refinamiento teórico y psicométrico.
Descargas
Referencias
Aarstad, J., & Jakobsen, S. E. (2019). Entrepreneurial causation and effectuation logics in a regional context: Assessing the importance of population density. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 73(5), 290-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2019.1669703
Alsos, G. A., Clausen, T. H., & Solvoll, S. (2014). Towards a better measurement scale of causation and effectuation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 13785. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.13785abstract.
Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. C. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0455
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction. Mplus Technical Appendix. http://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
Barzotto, L., & Nassif, V. M. J. (2019). Pequenas notáveis: o causation e o effectuation nas ações empreendedoras das PME’S/Small notables: the causation and effectuation in PMES entrepreneurial actions. Brazilian Journal of Development, 5(8), 11370-11391. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv5n8-016
Brennan, R. L., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). Coefficient Kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement (41)3, 687-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100307
Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.10.006
Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
Engel, Y., Kaandorp, M., & Elfring, T. (2017). Toward a dynamic process model of entrepreneurial networking under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.001
Faia, V. D. S., Rosa, M. A. G., & Machado, H. P. V. (2014). Entrepreneurial alertness and the causation and effectuation approaches to entrepreneurship. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 18(2), 196-216. https://www.scielo.br/j/rac/a/tNqzT8FCqNLyYZjpBhsnPTL/?format=pdf&lang=pt
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
Frese, T., Geiger, I. & Dost, F. (2020). An empirical investigation of determinants of effectual and causal decision logics in online and high-tech start-up firms. Small Bus Econ 54, 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00147-8
Galkina, T., & Lundgren-Henriksson, E. L. (2017). Coopetition as an entrepreneurial process: Interplay of causation and effectuation. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 158-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.004
Greven, A., Fischer-Kreer, D., Kaupel, E., Kallhoff, C., & Brettel, M. (2026). Unlocking the effectual orientation of corporations: Developing a new dictionary-based measure. Journal of Business Research, 210, Article 116131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116131
Hu, L., Varki, S., Paulich, B., & Libaers, D. (2025). Effectuation measurement: A comparative assessment using item response theory. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2025(1), 10540. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.10540abstract
International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
Koller, S., Stephan, U., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2022). Ecological rationality and entrepreneurship: How entrepreneurs fit decision logics to decision content and structure. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(4), Article 106221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106221
Koller, S., Ahmetoglu, G., & Stephan, U. (2025). Measuring entrepreneurs’ use of effectuation as heuristics: Development and validation of a situational judgment test (SJT) for effectuation. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(6), Article 106538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2025.106538
Krebbers, L. (2015). The first steps towards a quantitative measurement scale of Causation and Effectuation in a non-entrepreneurial student context (Master's thesis, Faculty of Management and Governance, University of Twente). University of Twente Student Theses. http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/67736
Kuckertz, A., Brändle, L., Gaudig, A., Hinderer, S., Reyes, C. A. M., Prochotta, A.,... & Berger, E. S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis–A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169
Laine, I., & Galkina, T. (2017). The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 905-941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0423-6
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2019). Robust Promin: a method for diagonally weighted factor rotation. Technical report, URV. Tarragona, Spain.
Mai, Y., Song, Y., Li, J., & Ye, Z. (2024). The synergistic effect of causation and effectuation on new venture’s innovation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), 15863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2024.15863abstract
McKelvie, A., Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., & Johansson, A. (2020). The measurement of effectuation: highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future. Small Business Economics, 54(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00149-6
Melo, F. L. N. B. D., Silva, R. R. D., & Almeida, T. N. V. D. (2019). Gender and Entrepreneurship: a comparative study between the Causation and Effectuation approaches. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 16(3), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2019.16.3.5
Mthanti, T. S., & Urban, B. (2014). Effectuation and entrepreneurial orientation in high-technology firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.850161
Nguyen, G. T., Solvoll, S., & Mauer, R. (2025). Capturing the ephemeral: A critical literature review on the measurements of effectuation. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2025(1), 24254. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.24254abstract
Ortega, A. M., García, M. T., & Santos, M. V. (2017). Effectuation-causation: what happens in new product development? Management Decision, 55(8), 1717–1735. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0160
Parida, V., George, N., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). Influence of subjective interpretation, causation, and effectuation on initial venture sale. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4815–4819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.036
Pasquali, L. (2010). Testes referentes a construto: teoria e modelo de construção. Instrumentos psicológicos: manual prático de elaboração (pp. 37-71). LabPAM/IBAPP.
Perry, J. T., Chandler, G. N., & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: a review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837-861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00435.x
Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006
Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. The Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 45- 62. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2005.605370
Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 24(6), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.005
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001a). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243- 263. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001b). Effectual reasoning in entrepreneurial decision making: existence and bounds. In Academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2001, No. 1, pp. D1-D6). Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/apbpp.2001.6133065
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sarasvathy, S. (2023). Questions worth asking for futures worth making: an effectual approach. Small Business Economics, 61(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00747-5
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2024). Lean hypotheses and effectual commitments: An integrative framework delineating the methods of science and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 50(8), 3035–3063. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241236445
Steil, A. V., Penha, M. M., & Bonilla, M. A. M. (2016). Antecedentes da retenção de pessoas em organizações: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 16(1), 88-102. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-66572016000100008&lng=pt&tlng=pt
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Yang, M., & Gabrielsson, P. (2017). Entrepreneurial marketing of international high-tech business-to-business new ventures: a decision-making process perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.01.007
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Mary Carlotto, Yasmin do Vale Figuereido, Jonatan Santana, Sonia Guedes, Josemberg Moura (Autor/a)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
La Revista Estudios Psicológicos del Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú está sobre una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0. Lo que permite que los archivos sean de libre acceso y distribuidos libremente.
LOS AUTORES RETIENEN SUS DERECHOS:
- Los autores retienen sus derechos de marca y patente, y tambien sobre cualquier proceso o procedimiento descrito en el artículo.
- Los autores retienen el derecho de compartir, copiar, distribuir, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente el artículo publicado en la Revista Estudios Psicológicos (por ejemplo, colocarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial.
- Los autores retienen el derecho a hacer una posterior publicación de su trabajo, de utilizar el artículo o cualquier parte de aquel (por ejemplo: una compilación de sus trabajos, notas para conferencias, tesis, o para un libro), siempre que indiquen la fuente de publicación (autores del trabajo, revista, volumen, número y fecha).
